<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.8.4 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:40:46 GMT--><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rss="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"><rss:channel rdf:about="http://thoughtleadership.squarespace.com/anti-god-delusion/"><rss:title>The Anti-God Delusion</rss:title><rss:link>http://thoughtleadership.squarespace.com/anti-god-delusion/</rss:link><rss:description></rss:description><dc:language>en-AU</dc:language><dc:date>2009-12-09T15:40:46Z</dc:date><admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.squarespace.com/">Squarespace Site Server v5.8.4 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</admin:generatorAgent><rss:items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://thoughtleadership.squarespace.com/anti-god-delusion/2007/9/3/book-by-richard-dawkins.html"/></rdf:Seq></rss:items></rss:channel><rss:item rdf:about="http://thoughtleadership.squarespace.com/anti-god-delusion/2007/9/3/book-by-richard-dawkins.html"><rss:title>Book by Richard Dawkins</rss:title><rss:link>http://thoughtleadership.squarespace.com/anti-god-delusion/2007/9/3/book-by-richard-dawkins.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Afroz Ali</dc:creator><dc:date>2007-09-03T13:47:14Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p align="justify" style="text-align: justify;">I was thinking hard for a name for this topic on hand, and nothing good came up... so I thought I'd simply say it as it is- scientists who reject God, particularly with extremely weak assertions, are indeed the deluded ones.</p><p align="justify" style="text-align: justify;">Richard Dawkins provides empirical proof of that by writing a rather entertaining book &quot;The God Delusion&quot;. He provides selective and sometimes rather illogical claims as to why he <em>thinks</em> God does not exist. He uses three specific tools to make his charge:</p><div align="justify" style="text-align: justify;"><ul><li>Rudeness like you have never seen before. I will not be rude with my review and comments, but I cannot promise I will be politically correct or diplomatic;</li><li>Coming up with &quot;<strong>chance</strong>&quot; as his best proof. OK...</li><li>Attempts at using logic and rational thinking, specifically the theory of evolution, to explain his way through a maze. I will spend much of my time trying to make sense of his such attempts.<br /></li></ul></div><p align="justify" style="text-align: justify;">This book of fiction, dressed up in intellectual non-fiction deserves a thorough review and critique. I hope to be able to do that soon.<br /></p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item></rdf:RDF>