<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.8.4 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:59:45 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>The Anti-God Delusion</title><link>http://thoughtleadership.squarespace.com/anti-god-delusion/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 14:19:59 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-AU</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.8.4 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Book by Richard Dawkins</title><dc:creator>Afroz Ali</dc:creator><pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2007 13:47:14 +0000</pubDate><link>http://thoughtleadership.squarespace.com/anti-god-delusion/2007/9/3/book-by-richard-dawkins.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">161533:1542733:1238764</guid><description><![CDATA[<p align="justify" style="text-align: justify;">I was thinking hard for a name for this topic on hand, and nothing good came up... so I thought I'd simply say it as it is- scientists who reject God, particularly with extremely weak assertions, are indeed the deluded ones.</p><p align="justify" style="text-align: justify;">Richard Dawkins provides empirical proof of that by writing a rather entertaining book &quot;The God Delusion&quot;. He provides selective and sometimes rather illogical claims as to why he <em>thinks</em> God does not exist. He uses three specific tools to make his charge:</p><div align="justify" style="text-align: justify;"><ul><li>Rudeness like you have never seen before. I will not be rude with my review and comments, but I cannot promise I will be politically correct or diplomatic;</li><li>Coming up with &quot;<strong>chance</strong>&quot; as his best proof. OK...</li><li>Attempts at using logic and rational thinking, specifically the theory of evolution, to explain his way through a maze. I will spend much of my time trying to make sense of his such attempts.<br /></li></ul></div><p align="justify" style="text-align: justify;">This book of fiction, dressed up in intellectual non-fiction deserves a thorough review and critique. I hope to be able to do that soon.<br /></p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://thoughtleadership.squarespace.com/anti-god-delusion/rss-comments-entry-1238764.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>