<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.8.4 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:00:28 GMT--><rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0"><channel><title>Moral Consensus</title><link>http://thoughtleadership.squarespace.com/moral-consensus/</link><description></description><lastBuildDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:52:44 +0000</lastBuildDate><copyright></copyright><language>en-AU</language><generator>Squarespace Site Server v5.8.4 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</generator><item><title>Jihad of Getting Things Right</title><dc:creator>Afroz Ali</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:51:29 +0000</pubDate><link>http://thoughtleadership.squarespace.com/moral-consensus/2009/3/18/jihad-of-getting-things-right.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">161533:1743585:3358356</guid><description><![CDATA[Professor Shaykh Tariq Ramadan explains what the ethics of struggle to get things right is all about.

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/IYpXjFXvwN8&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/IYpXjFXvwN8&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://thoughtleadership.squarespace.com/moral-consensus/rss-comments-entry-3358356.xml</wfw:commentRss></item><item><title>Moral Darkness in Politics</title><dc:creator>Afroz Ali</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 25 Nov 2007 21:59:21 +0000</pubDate><link>http://thoughtleadership.squarespace.com/moral-consensus/2007/11/25/moral-darkness-in-politics.html</link><guid isPermaLink="false">161533:1743585:1390031</guid><description><![CDATA[<p>Is it governance or politics? That question&nbsp;itself may be a question that will need some shared thoughts and propositions.</p><p>The global world is losing much of a moral platform in its political leaders. I had written an article just days before the 2007 Australian Federal Elections about the &quot;<a href="http://thoughtleadership.squarespace.com/2007-australian-elections/2007/11/25/the-broken-moral-compass.html" target="_blank">Broken Moral Compass</a>&quot;. And there will definitely be more to ponder on and write about Australia itself&nbsp;in days and months to come. This was also the general consensus of a pre-election television program I participated in, that the moral compass was the big question of this and future elections. The program aired, incidentally by ABC called&nbsp;&quot;Compass&quot; hosted by the intelligent and thought-provoking Geraldine Doogue, was titled &quot;<a class="offsite-link-inline" href="http://www.abc.net.au/compass/s2095130.htm" target="_blank">One Vote- Which Values</a>&quot;.</p><p>The latest such call, and condemnation of political leaders, has come from the Anglican Archbishop of Canterbury, saying that USA had lost its &quot;<a class="offsite-link-inline" href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20071125/us_nm/religion_anglicans_usa_dc" target="_blank">high moral ground since the September 11 attacks</a>&quot;.</p><p>The absence of morality in politics, and governance, is being felt everywhere. Those who do bot feel it are probably still sleeping.&nbsp;From aethists to religious leaders, the subject of morality is fundamental to understanding how civilisations develop or come crushing down. Our aim through this section&nbsp;is to discuss and propose how we could help our civilisation to develop and progress further, not slip into a dark abyss.</p>]]></description><wfw:commentRss>http://thoughtleadership.squarespace.com/moral-consensus/rss-comments-entry-1390031.xml</wfw:commentRss></item></channel></rss>